More and more over the past few weeks, the topic of the economic bailout has been at the forefront of the news.  The more the government promises, the more companies hold out their hands saying “gimme”.  And during this whole game, homeowners who can’t pay their mortgages are crying out that it’s not their fault and they need help and it’s the lenders who caused their problems – and what’s worse is that the government is saying “okay” and granting the ability to refinance at lower interest rates and bailing out mortgage companies.  When will people and businesses accept responsibility for their own actions and bad choices, and take the blame for the consequences onto themselves where it belongs?

I am by no means stating that I believe all the fault lies with the consumer, but I will also not pretend to place blame entirely on the lending companies.  I can’t say whether the fault is 50/50, but I do know that it is split between the two.  I’ve had many discussions with friends and family about this issue, and feel very strongly about it for a number of reasons.

One of the many lessons I remember from my childhood (having had most of them repeated over and over again throughout the years since as a young boy I refused to listen) is that you have to accept blame for your actions.  You can’t stand up and accept the praise for something you did right if you refuse to stand up and own the consequences of something you did wrong.  Unfortunately, that’s exactly what the majority of these homeowners are trying to do right now.  They shouted from the rooftops when they were granted the exhorbitant mortgage loans that they asked for, and now they’re crying from the gutter when they couldn’t pay those mortgages and their homes were foreclosed.

I’m not some horrible tyrant who is happy these people are losing their homes.  By no means do I want to see them homeless and without a safe place to stay.  However, they put themselves in this position of their own free will.  Nobody came up to them and told them to forget about their $30,000 annual income and apply for a $250,000 home loan.  And even if they did, anyone who said “okay” and went straight to the bank to take out that loan is an absolute fool.  It’s simple math.  It’s not a complex calculation that requires a genius or accountant or real estate agent – it requires a pen and paper and a 4th grade education.  My 10 year old brother could easily explain the dynamics of the equation to these people.  Granted, that’s not quite fair since he is a little genius, but the point remains the same.  The below math is generic and estimated, but you’ll get the idea:

$250,000 home loan + Accrued interest = (Average monthly mortgage payment) * (Number of years to be paid out) * (12 months per year)
$250,000 + ? = $900 * (30 Years * 12 Months)
$250,000 + ? = $324,000
$250,000 + $74,000 = $324,000

This is crude math.  The last thing I need to hear is how it’s not exactly right.  I was very generous with the interest to make a point.  If you’ll look at the second line you’ll notice that even with only a $900 monthly payment (barely more than I pay for a one bedroom apartment just outside of Dallas), you’re committing yourself to over $10,000 a year in mortgage payments.  When you only make $30,000 before taxes, that means you’ve decided that over 1/3 of the money you bring home every year goes straight to a mortgage.  How does that make sense?  Or how does it even add up?  It doesn’t.  And this is why people are losing their homes.  They felt so fancy that they were approved for the huge loan they asked for, that they never stopped to think if they could really pay for it all.

What’s even more frustrating is that the individuals being foreclosed who are having these problems are being granted the ability to refinance at a lower interest rate and extend the timeframe of their mortgage, but the individuals who are not in this negative state are not being granted the same opportunity.  So you have the irresponsible people who never should’ve taken out the loan in the first place being granted special priviliges, and those who have been cutting back and managing to pay their mortgage entirely and on time are not getting any such benefits or priviliges; instead, their taxes are going to help out their irresponsible neighbors instead.  I find this sickening.  Reward the ones who don’t deserve it, and punish those who do?  Our government exhibits such wonderful logic.

Yes, there is some blame to be laid at the feet of the lenders.  While the consumer should never have asked for such an astronomical loan when their income was so low, the lender should’ve evaluated their available monetary income to see right away it would never work in the long run.  But they didn’t.  Why?  Because it’s a business and the business isn’t concerned with how you’re going to make your payments, just that you make them.  And if you don’t make them, they take back your house.  They still come out at a loss, but they’re hoping that’s incentive enough for you to find a way to make good on the contract you signed with them when they agreed to give you the money.  Silly them, because they’re quickly finding that it’s not.

Now everyone is asking for a handout.  The mortgage companies want a bailout because they lost so much money from people who couldn’t afford to pay back the loans they took out.  The consumer because they’re losing their home because “the big bad lending company” took advantage of them.  Everyone’s pointing fingers and nobody’s willing to take the blame.  Both are at fault and neither will admit it.  Our economy did not randomly start spiraling downwards.  There are always factors that elicit a reaction.  This just happens to be one of the big ones.

I would like nothing more than to own a home right now.  I pay almost as much in apartment rent as I would to own a home and pay a mortgage, but I know better than that.  I know that I’m not ready, financially and otherwise, to own my own house just yet.  I’d like to, but I’m not quite there.  Could I get approved for a loan and jump in headfirst anyways?  Yes, I’m sure I could.  I have good credit and while my salary isn’t by any means huge, it’s enough to get a moderate home loan.  But I won’t do it because I know better.  I’m not a genius, I just have common sense.  All I dare to ask for and hope for is that the rest of America (and the world) exhibit signs of the same.  Sadly, I just don’t think it’s going to happen anytime soon.

5 Responses to “Who’s to blame for the state of our economy?”
  1. M.O.M. says:

    According to an article I read in the Dallas Morning News (I know, don’t believe everything you read in the paper), what will happen with most of these mortgages is that they’ll be extended, but the people will still have to pay back all the original loan. Can you imagine a 30-year loan being extended to a 40-year loan?! Some of the problems with loans was due to people’s stupidity, some due to their ignorance (their laziness to research or inability to pay someone else to do it for them), and some were actually lied to about the type of loan they were getting. I do want to point out one important fact about the guy next door who paid his mortgage vs the one who didn’t, not getting a “bail out.” When you buy a home, the list price comes directly from a result of neighborhood comps (what other comparable homes sold for). You can ask for the moon, but that’s what is the “market price.” Now, if several individuals in your neighborhood are foreclosed on, the bank takes those houses back and sells them as quick as they can for way less than their “value.” So, all the other mortgage paying neighbors have the “value” of their homes lowered. Not really fair to them. So for the paying people, it is just as important to their property values that the non-paying people stay in their homes to keep their houses worth more (its “worth” is only what someone will pay, and that seldom is over “market.” Okay, real estate 101 lesson over. I sincerely hope this is a wake-up call to all that are living beyond their means. I know it’s human nature to let others do for you and to take what’s offered, but at some point there is accountability. I prefer to hold myself accountable and not leave it up to anyone else That saying, “if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem,” could also read, “if you have a solution, you won’t have a problem.” lol I love to read other people’s responses & learn new things, & I hope from time to time I might pass some along. Love you, Dean.

  2. Pam says:

    Let us not forget the federal government and their involvement in this mess. They pushed the mortgage companies to give loans to those less fortunate individuals, you know the ones, bad credit, lower income, poor job history (I am not sure of their exact requirements) they pushed them by either extending a penalty if they didn’t give a certain number of lower income loans out and rewarded those that provided more loans for those that under normal circumstances would never have gotten a loan. So there is enough blame to go around. I say vote them all out and start over maybe they would get the hint after all we put them in office to help not hurt the country. And as for the mortgage companies and the individuals if it were not on such a large scale I would say let them fall and fail then they might not do it again if given a chance. When I was growing up I would want something bad and beg Mom please pretty please everyone else has one. My Mothers classic response if your friend jumped off a bridge would you want to do that? Net every good deal is a good deal for me there are a lot of other factors to consider than want. For a young guy you are sharp in the area of finance much more so then I was at your age. I too believe you will have a home sooner than later and not just because you live within a budget but because you also have great ability to wait and not impulse buy and to save rather then splurge. Way to go Dean.

  3. Lil ol me says:

    I am proud of you for waiting and budgeting for your TV. “You’ve come a long way, Baby!”
    As for the discussion topic – yes, the Mortgage Companies got greedy and the Government became ‘enablers’, but where did we as Americans get the glamour highlife idea? I have relatives that have gorgeous multimillion dollar homes, while I have one that is less than $120,000. However, I know their salary range is much higher than mine and they can afford it. It doesn’t mean they are better than me, and it doesn’t mean that I deserve to have the same as them. They were fortunate enough to have business opportunities that were different than mine. Some went on to have a higher degree of education than mine. Some went into businesses that pay more than mine. I made a choice as to my line of work and I know the financial drawbacks and I do not begrudge them the rewards of their labor. But I do not understand how the person who does not aspire to do more than work at the local burger joint for minimum wage thinks he deserves to drive a Cadillac and have a 6 bedroom home with a media room with a 60 inch HDTV with a pool and Jacuzzi in the back. Do we have too many tabloids with pictures of movie star homes? Does Oprah show too many pictures of the rich and famous? I look at the horrible conditions that two thirds of the world lives in and can’t help but think what an ungrateful, spoiled society we live in. Yes, we live in America so that we can have the ‘Good Life’, but less than 60 years ago that meant putting a roof over your family’s head and clothes on their backs and food on the table by working hard and saving, not overextending credit cards and buying luxury items and homes just for appearances sake. Maybe the slogan today should read “You’ve come a long way, Brat!”

  4. Tinamarie says:

    I agree and I did not agree with the buy out. How in the hell is my daughter going to be paying for this buy out when she can’t even work or live in her own house. If I had a baby at the time this buy out took place that child will be paying and have not even learned the words mama or dada. Crazy!

  5. CreativeCrasher says:

    You forgort to factor TAXES!! Most people did not account for the $2500 to $4800 depending on your area that must be paid at the end of the year. Government is not responsible for bailing out companies. The companies should have filed bankruptcy. This would have been better as the company will then fire the irresponsible executives and hire someone who would restructure the company for the better. example: airlines industry who failed and now restructured and are still in business and have created new jobs.

    The American citizen is the ultimate blame as they signed the constract and it should have been read. Govenrments only involment (in constitiution) is to enfore the contract and that is it. Some blame is the Executives that allowed someone to get a loan that they counld not pay back in 30 years or 40 years on their current income.

    Oh yeah, did anyone think to follow the money trail. Why do you think the senate and congressmen wanted the bailout. Most of them would have lost millions in stock. It was personal gain for them. Yes, Obama (Citigroup) and McCain (Chase) both had millions invested in the banks.

  6.  
Trackbacks
  1.  
Leave a Reply